Family Shames, 4 of 4; A Shameful Tale

          Family Shames

4.     A Shameful Tale

          If you put together the speculations of the previous three posts, then you get a truly shameful tale of human prehistory, as follows:

          In the old days, Big Men had harems, and all other men were losers. The only hope the loser men had was to slay some Big Man, kill his children, and then rape the women. Of course the women detested this lion-like system, but those compliant to it reproduced more than those resistant to it, which left a genetic trace that our species bears to this very day; as proven by our adulation of killers and tyrants.

          One day a loser man discovered a marvelous magic trick. Simply share spoiled fruit juice with an otherwise resistant woman. She will lose control before he loses potency. This trick spread. Women easily made drunk reproduced more; a genetic trace that our species bears to this very day. The same evolutionary pressures that created violent men and submissive women, then started to create devious men and drunken women. In other words, rape started to shift from force to fraud.

          Eventually someone figured out the brewing of beer. It requires settled colonies and the hard labor of farming; an indignity that men were willing to suffer, for the sake of a magic sex potion.

Big Men dominated these colonies, but soon were outnumbered, and they were forced by political necessity to institute sexual socialism; share and share alike. The losers won… it seems. It’s fraudulent of course; Big Men still gather harems whenever possible.

Civilization is full of fraud, for it is based upon fraud; a genetic trace that we bear to this very day.

Family Shames, 3 of 4; Mr. Charisma

Family Shames

3.     Mr. Charisma

         

          The Catholic Church is still reeling from the pedophilia scandals; but the priests are not alone in this. There have been pedophiles amongst teachers, nurses, coaches… anywhere that adults routinely meet with children. Why is this so?

          This tendency reaches its peak in isolated cults, whose leaders show a consistent tendency to monopolize the youngest females. This is clearly reversion to a harem-based reproduction strategy, common in the animal kingdom, and not unknown in biblical history.

           I have elsewhere explained monogamy as sexual socialism; an artificial modification of human sexuality imposed by church and state to minimize the political dangers of masses of unattached men. But that same church, and that same state, had their historical origins in Big Men, who were never monogamists at all.

The Big Men were winners; all other men were losers; but the losers outnumbered the winners, so eventually they won after all. But it’s an artificial victory, and a recent one, barely ten millennia old. Every so often natural man peeks out, and civilization is shocked.

Family Shames, 2 of 4; A Magic Trick

Family Shames

2.     A Magic Trick

          Women are biochemically more vulnerable to alcohol than men are. They are more strongly affected by the same amount, even when measured against body weight; and they take longer to metabolize it away. Why this difference?

          Any frat-boy can tell you why. If you want her to say yes, then get her drunk. If he matches her drink for drink, then she’ll lose control before he loses ability. Alcohol is the original date-rape drug.

          What a simple and effective mating strategy! From the point of view of late Paleolithic man, booze must have seemed a magic potion! Late Paleolithic woman may have had a different opinion; but the ones who said yes tended to have more children than the others; with predictable evolutionary consequences.

          Some anthropologists theorize that agriculture, and with it civilization, was started not exactly for food security, but specifically for the brewing of beer. Farming’s hard work, and a hunter-gatherer can hunt or gather food anywhere; but for a magic sex potion, even a proud hunter will stoop to farming!

          Civilization began with a magic trick; drugged date-rape; a mating strategy still imprinted on our genes.

Family Shames, 1 of 4; O so Masculine

Family Shames

1.     O so Masculine

2.     A Magic Trick

3.     Mr. Charisma

4.     A Shameful Tale

          I write these blog posts to expose three Family Shames; and the family I refer to is the entire human species. I see, in certain quirks of human behavior, the genetic imprint of successful mating strategies dating back to the Paleolithic; and these strategies are not exactly admirable.

1.     O so Masculine

          I see in the news that George Zimmerman, famed for shooting to death a 17-year-old armed with Skittles, is in trouble again, this time for domestic abuse. He had already left his wife; this is another woman; and the question is, why would any woman seek such a man?

          GZ is not alone in enjoying such curious solicitude. Death Row inmates are routinely mailed marriage proposals from women utterly unknown to them. This effect goes beyond the personal to the political; for it is also routine for the worst tyrants to inspire the greatest loyalty. Why?

          I think this resembles a curious custom amongst the lions. A lion pride has one adult male; sooner or later he is challenged by a wandering younger male; if he is defeated then the young male takes his place; and the first thing he does is kill all the lion cubs. What then follows is (to a human) mind-bending; namely, the lionesses make new cubs, and this by mating with the very same male who had just killed their cubs!

          From an evolutionary point of view this makes sense. The new lion is strong, so his cubs will be strong too. I suspect that a similar logic used to apply to Paleolithic humankind. It was a strategy that our distant ancestors borrowed from the lions; truly the King of Beasts, for I have a low opinion of kings, and now of lions, and now of our distant ancestors, who gave us tendencies that we bear to this very day. 

Sorry About That

       Sorry About That

          A Jewish Apology

          Rush Limbaugh has denounced Pope Francis’s anti-capitalism as “pure Marxism”. Not exactly; it’s closer to Jesus than Marx. I’ve been astonished by hearing such irreverence towards money from, of all people, the Pope; and of course that’s naive of me. Of course a Christian religious leader might quote basic Christian doctrine; why am I surprised?

          Perhaps I am too used to papal denunciation of capitalism’s discredited rival, communism. Now that the Soviet Union has fallen, and even Maoist China has taken the capitalist road, I suppose it’s time for the pope to pivot to denouncing capitalism. It’s modernism’s biggest heresy, and the Catholic Church is anti-modernist.

          I agree, in part, with Limbaugh. Francis’s anti-capitalism is indeed related to Marx’s. Both find support in the New Testament:

          Acts 2:44-45
          All that believed were together, and had all things in common; And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.

          Acts 11:29
          And the disciples, every man according to his ability, determined to send relief unto the brethren that dwelt in Judea.

          Acts 4: 34-35
          Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, And laid them down at the apostle’s feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.

          From each according to his ability, to each according to his need! This is a plain connection between the New Testament and the “Critique of the Gotha Program”. Jesus and friends weren’t exactly what we’d call commies; they claimed the support of religion, not science. Nonetheless they did live communally, and they did despise money; so Limbaugh has a point.

          Which brings me to the main point of this post. I write to apologize to the world’s Gentiles, on behalf of my fellow Jews, for my tribe’s annoying tendency to create disruptive belief systems.

          There’s Jesus and Marx, as Limbaugh complained; more recently we’ve produced Freud and Ayn Rand. Fortunately the Freud thing has run its course; it was never more than confessionals for the rich, and it never had results better than 33% cured, 33% worse, 34% unchanged. Alas, the Rand follies continue. Unlike Sigmund, who unsuccessfully tried to heal the insanity of the rich, Ayn’s had much more success in praising that insanity.

          What Gentiles need to understand is that we Jews like to argue with each other. Judaism’s a religion of unity, to be sure; but e pluribus unum, and you need the pluribus to get to the unum. We constantly concoct absurd heresies, just in case one of them works, and for the pleasure of laughing off the ones that don’t. It’s all good clean fun, until someone takes a debating point seriously. Occasionally one of our experiments escapes from the laboratory and terrorizes the world.

          I am so sorry. We really didn’t mean it.

          A piece of advice; take us with a grain of salt. We sure do.