More
about a Yottabyte
In yesterday’s blog I spoke with
amazement, and some incredulity, about the NSA's yottabyte-storage facility. I
marvelled out loud what use the NSA could have for 1.6 moles of bytes; or how
they could process it, or secure it.
But I forgot to mention how much
they say they paid for it. 2 billion dollars; small change by federal
standards, to be sure, but it's the sort of moolah that'll get a 29-year old a
200 grand-per-year salary. I wondered out loud if the whole thing wasn't some
kind of spook scam. Perhaps that was uncharitable of me. Let me take their
figures seriously, and see where that leads me.
2 gigabux for a yottabyte; at that
rate, 2 bucks will buy you 10^15 bytes; a quadrillion! My machine is a thousand
times too slow to use a petabyte drive; so better yet, how about 0.2 cents for
a terabyte drive? Or one zinc cent for five terabytes? I'd snap that right up.
NSA's getting bargains like that?
Hey, I want in! It's a crime that
they're keeping
this deal to themselves!
But maybe it's just more spy-lies.
The whole thing smells fishy. Maybe they paid a lot more than 2 gigabux, and
got a lot less than 1 yottabyte. Since it's secret, how do I know that it's not
corrupt?
PS: all
this gave me a workout in remembering the metric prefixes:
kilo, mega, giga, tera, peta, exa, zetta, yotta. Here's a
mnemonic:
Kelley Meghan's Gigantic Terrapin Pets
Extremely Zesty Yetis.
Then there's milli, micro, nano, pico, femto, atto, zepto, yocto:
Millicent Might Not Pick Fetching A Zapped
Yak.
No comments:
Post a Comment