Neurolinguistics of the Boredome
I
have noticed a strange phenomenon at the intersection of politics and
linguistics. Speech by bureaucrats, ideologues, militarists, financiers and
academics shares a curious quality: mind-numbing boredom. If you read or hear
it, then your eyes glaze over. It induces a stultifying agony; something goes
squirt in your head, and your mind shuts down.
I call this effect the Boredome, and I have seen it in
action. Once I saw an auditorium full of mathematicians all nodding off in
unison. I too had to struggle to retain consciousness. It was like witnessing a
wizard utter a magic spell, and everyone around him passes out.
I have two questions. Why the Boredome? And _how_ the
Boredome? The Why question is political, and has been well explored by Orwell
and others. The Boredome is usually cast to hide something; the speaker’s
injustice or illogic or incapacity. Therefore the political necessity of
penetrating the Boredome.
But the How question is neurolinguistic, and it baffles me.
How is such a thing even possible?
A scientific answer to the How question would have obvious
technological applications; the Boredome as a general anaesthetic, say, or as a
weapon of war. But perhaps we could also find ways to reverse the effect, and
talk in ways that wake people up.
Comments:
DSL:
“Bodhi”
is usually translated as “enlightenment.” But that is a poor/misleading
translation. A better one would be “Awakeness.” Thus, the alternative discourse
you seek already exists; it is the Dharma!
DS:
People
follow their passions, steered by emotions and reason; and the passions are our
evolved internal reward-seeking systems, plus anything that has gotten
associated with them through learning. Things that seem to point toward our
passions are interesting. Boredom is a desire to avoid what is not interesting,
and is generated when we pay attention to what does not point toward our
passions or evoke our emotions or engage our intellect. And I suspect our
intellect is not engaged without association with passion or emotion.
Therefore, to induce boredom with verbal communication, one
should avoid cues in body language, voice tone and pacing, or word choice, that
indicate or stimulate interest. For maximum disinterest, not only a word’s
primary contextual meaning, but also its other meanings and implications,
should lack anything stimulating. Also, brain fatigue can be used to make
boredom more likely.
Brain fatigue can be induced by several methods: Speaking
at great length. Passive verbs. Long, complex sentences. Abstract, or otherwise
ambiguous, words and phrases, with avoidance of specific, physical examples.
For maximum effect, meaningless, but not _obviously_ nonsensical, statements,
can be used. Anything that puts a load on the brain’s interpretive functions is
useful here; though, if there is a danger of saying something actually
interesting, it might be better to just drone on and on with simple, obvious
words.
One possible way to stave off boredom is to be aware of the
various boredom-causing structures and methods in the communication, or try to
devise methods for detecting any actual information that may have crept in.
NH:
Very
good. But questions remain.
To
recap:
CO2
may help explain the effect in closed rooms, but the effect can be transmitted
long-distance.
Boredom
can be verbally induced by:
limp
body language,
dull
pacing and tone,
predictable
vocabulary,
unimaginative
rhetoric,
lack
of coherent meaning.
This
signals lack of interesting content, which triggers boredom. But in addition to
this are various brain-tiring tricks, such as:
Verbosity
Evasiveness
Unclarity
Hesitation
Mumbling
Pointless
ambiguity
Empty
abstraction
Lightly
disguised nonsense
And
in general, “ anything that puts a load on the brain’s interpretive functions.”
This is an exciting insight; it suggests that the boredom effect (and its
dharmic opposite) can be traced to neuro-energetics. Perhaps certain brain structures
have energetic limits, that can be deliberately overloaded for the Boredome,
and underloaded for Dharma.
I
propose this experiment: that volunteers listen to various texts (boring or
awakening) with their heads inside a brain-scanning machine. With this perhaps
we can get a fix on the neural dynamics involved. Also this sounds like a
hella-cool mad-science experiment. I hope the ethics committee approves.
Finally, you propose that consciousness can be protected
under boredom-assault by conscious awareness of the methods used to assault
consciousness. I have found that “um”-counting is useful in emergencies. You
also propose sophisticated signal analysis to extract meaning from the noise.
But please note that noise itself is the main intended signal.
DS:
Not
all things that bore us have noise as the intend signal. Jargon may be intended
to baffle, or it may be the compact technical vocabulary of a specific trade,
or even an unfortunate speech habit acquired from too much exposure to one or
the other of these. It is useful to be able to distinguish. Underloading the
brain’s interpretive abilities might require clarity, precision, variety, and,
where possible, concision. The concept of elegance may be applicable here. Note
that these properties are what is sought by developing a compact technical
vocabulary. Which may be opaque to those who do not share it. A person of my
acquaintance once tried with great effort and sincerely to explain his current
work in the field of fungus genetics, but did not know how to translate it into
layman’s terms.
No comments:
Post a Comment