Part 9.
Antiplutic Norms.
This essay’s skeptical critique of
the money system is mild, compared to some people’s raging contempt for
the money system. Indeed there are entire sectors of society in which money not
only does not exist, it must not
exist. Morality demands that certain situations not involve any money at all.
A spouse who sells sexual favors is
called unfaithful, and divorced; a judge who sells rulings is called corrupt,
and disbarred; and a soldier who sells military secrets is called a traitor,
and executed. I call these “antiplutic norms”, and they enforce the necessary
incompleteness of the money system, in defense of competing systems.
For how much money, dear reader,
would you accept in exchange for your citizenship? Or your human rights? Or
your name?
Would you change your religion for a
cash payment? If not, then why not? If so, then for how much? Can you pay a
libertarian to become a communist? If not, then why not? If so, then for how
much?
No comments:
Post a Comment