Chapter 6 : Three Marks
Three Marks
Trinary Algebra
6A. Three Marks
The bracket [x] swaps 0 and 1, and
leaves 6 fixed. But there are other permutations of the three forms. Let
<x> swap 6 and 0, leaving 1 fixed; and let {x} swap 1 and 6, leaving 0 fixed.
Then for any form x we get these forms:
{x} the brace
<x> the wedge
[x] the bracket
In particular we have these forms:
{} = 0
<> = 6
[]= 1
[x] the bracket
In particular we have these forms:
{} = 0
<> = 6
[]= 1
There are also the “double-crosses”:
[[x]],
<<x>>, {{x}}, {[x]}, [<x>], <{x}>, [{x}], <[x]>,
{<x>}
They have these identities:
[[x]]
= <<x>> =
{{x}} = x
[<x>]
= {[x]} = <{x}>
<[x]>
= [{x}] = {<x>}
They have these tables:
x {} <> [] _
(x) {} <> []
{[x]} <> [] {}
[{x}] [] {} <>
{x} {} [] <>
<x> <> {} []
[x] [] <> {}
x 0 6 1 _
(x) 0 6 1
{[x]} 6 1 0
[{x}] 1 0 6
{x} 0 1 6
<x> 6 0 1
[x] 1 6 0
The crosses and double-crosses permute 0,6,1, and form the group S3.
Here is S3’s group table:
f(g) | g = x {[x]} [{x}] <x> [x] {x}
______|_________________________________________
f= |
x | x {[x]} [{x}] <x> [x] {x}
{[x]}| {[x}] [{x}] x [x] {x} <x>
[{x}]| [{x}] x {[x]}
{x} <x> [x]
<x> | <x> {x} [x] x [{x}] {[x]}
[x] | [x] <x> {x} {[x]} x [{x}]
{x} | {x} [x] <x> [{x}] {[x]} x
6B. Trinary Algebra
These equations hold for
all forms x:
{{x}} = <<x>> = [[x]] = x ‘Double-Cross’
{[x]} = [<x>] = <{x}> ‘Anti-commutativity’
[{x}] = <[x]> = {<x>}
Since {}=void, it follows that
{{}} = <<>> = [[]] = {}
{{x}} = <<x>> = [[x]] = x ‘Double-Cross’
{[x]} = [<x>] = <{x}> ‘Anti-commutativity’
[{x}] = <[x]> = {<x>}
Since {}=void, it follows that
{{}} = <<>> = [[]] = {}
{[]} = <{}> = [<>]
= <>
{<>} = <[]> = [{}] = []
{<>} = <[]> = [{}] = []
Note that ()=void, and {}=void; but (x)=x for all x, and {x}=x only for void. The braces mark the unmarked without marking it; but it distinguishes between the other two marks. It’s a meta-distinction.
Here are some axioms for triple forms:
Order Laws:
xy = yx
xx = x
{}x = x
[]x = []
Group Laws:
x = {{x}} = [[x]] = <<x>>
{[x]} = [<x>] =<{x}>
[{x}] = <[x]> = {<x>}
xx = x
{}x = x
[]x = []
Group Laws:
x = {{x}} = [[x]] = <<x>>
{[x]} = [<x>] =<{x}>
[{x}] = <[x]> = {<x>}
Transpositions:
[[x][y]]z = [[xz][yz]]
<<x><y>>z = <<xz><yz>>
{<<{x}><{y}>>}z = {<<{xz}><{yz}>>}
Relocation:
[[x]x] [<>] = <>
Open
questions for the ambitious student:
Do these triple-bracket axioms
imply a normal form?
Are these axioms deductively
complete?
Is there a more
succinct, but complete set of axioms for triple forms?
No comments:
Post a Comment