Political Perversities and Misnomers
How
to predict ‘conservatism’: it always chooses the more destructive option.
Whatever injures, ruins or kills more; that will be called conservative. This
is, of course, straight-up doublethink. War is peace, slavery is freedom,
destruction conserves.
Why this perversity? Why don’t conservatives conserve? Is the very name a Big Lie?
And in other perversities: why don’t liberals liberate? Why don’t libertarians liberate? And why don’t progressives progress?
I suppose it has to do with the corruption of power, the limits of language, and the inherent dynamism of the world. I propose these corrections to the misnomers conservative, liberal, libertarian and progressive: respectively destructivist, regulist, propertarian, and retreatist.
Why this perversity? Why don’t conservatives conserve? Is the very name a Big Lie?
And in other perversities: why don’t liberals liberate? Why don’t libertarians liberate? And why don’t progressives progress?
I suppose it has to do with the corruption of power, the limits of language, and the inherent dynamism of the world. I propose these corrections to the misnomers conservative, liberal, libertarian and progressive: respectively destructivist, regulist, propertarian, and retreatist.
No comments:
Post a Comment