Part 9. Antiplutic Norms.
This essay’s skeptical critique of the money system is mild, compared to some people’s raging contempt for the money system. Indeed there are entire sectors of society in which money not only does not exist, it must not exist. Morality demands that certain situations not involve any money at all.
A spouse who sells
sexual favors is called unfaithful, and divorced; a judge who sells rulings is
called corrupt, and disbarred; and a soldier who sells military secrets is
called a traitor, and executed. I call these “antiplutic norms”, and they
enforce the necessary incompleteness of the money system, in defense of
competing systems.
For how much money, dear reader, would you accept in exchange for your citizenship? Or your human rights? Or your name?
Would you change your religion for a cash payment? If not, then why not? If so, then for how much? Can you pay a libertarian to become a communist? If not, then why not? If so, then for how much?
No comments:
Post a Comment