Political Information Dilemmas
American
education poses a dilemma for those who run the political system, namely; shall
the people learn or not? If the people do not learn, then they become
unproductive and the economy collapses; but if the people do learn, then they
become productive but out of control. Indeed, the more they learn, the more
they want to take over!
Recent
history gives vivid illustration of this dilemma. In the 60’s, we saw the
post-Sputnik initiative. What was the result? By the end of the decade,
Americans were walking on the moon, and rioting in the campuses! In 1980, an
anti-intellectual was elected President, and a different attitude towards
education took hold. The result? Much more political stability, but decades of
stagnant median income.
Explosion
or collapse? The ideal solution, from the 1% point of view, is a kind of golden
mediocrity, where education teaches the masses just enough to work, and not
enough to make trouble. The trouble is that the lines sometimes cross, and you
need to know more to work than you need to make trouble; then mediocrity gives
everyone trouble but no work.
60’s
or 80’s? In the 60’s, America went to the Moon. In the 80’s, America went to
Hell. All in all I prefer the Moon.
Snowden
and Assange have taught us that there is a similar dilemma concerning secrecy.
If internal communications of secretive agencies are not censored, then the
agency risks exposure by leak; but if internal communications are censored,
then the agency becomes stupid. As in the education dilemma, the operators and
owners of the system face a choice between controlled collapse into stupidity
and uncontrolled ascent into rebellion; and as in the education dilemma, golden
mediocrity fails when the lines cross, and it becomes easier for a disgruntled
agent to rebel than to report.
In
both cases information flow is a problem. From the 1% point of view,
information is a kind of explosive lubricant; if it doesn’t flow, then the
system seizes up, but if it does flow, then the system blows up. Golden mediocrity
fails when revolt is simpler than labor.
There
is a deeper problem, and it is political. Why the revolt of the informed
public? Because knowledge gives power, and refutes excuses.
No comments:
Post a Comment