6. Logistic Fixedpoints
Let F
denote the generic finite positive quantity. The triple 0,F,∞ are then logistic ‘seen at low-resolution’, for all finite positives are confused. In
this low-rez view, here are tables for addition, reduction, Einstein
addition and reciprocal:
+ 0
F ∞ {+} 0
F ∞ ~
0 F ∞ 1/x
0 0
F ∞ 0 0
0 0 0
0 F ∞ ∞
F F F ∞ F
0 F F
F F F
F F
∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞
0 F ∞ ∞ ∞
F 0 0
These are isomorphic to
‘and’, ‘or’, ‘iff’ and ‘not’, in three-valued Kleenean logic, if we identify 0
with True, Finite with Intermediate, and ∞
with False. So logistic, at low resolution, looks Kleenean.
Kleenean
logic has a fixedpoint property:
The
following self-referential system, if Kleenean, has a solution:
x1 =
F1(x1, x2, … xn,…)
x2 =
F2(x1, x2, … xn,…)
…
xn =
Fn(x1, x2, … xn,…)
…
We
can find such a fixedpoint by iteration. Start by setting all the x’s to the
intermediate truth value I; evaluate the functions; substitute these values
back into the x’s; repeat. The iteration will converge to a fixedpoint in
finitely many steps if the system is finite. If the system is infinite, then it
converges after sufficiently large-ordinal transfinite iteration.
Self-referential
Kleenean systems have solutions; logistic is Kleenean at low resolution;
therefore logistic self-refers at low-rez. Does it self-refer at high-rez?
Define
a logistic function as “positive” if it is defined from variables, constants,
addition and reduction only; no reciprocals. Then you can prove by induction
that positive logistic functions preserve linear order; and this implies that
any self-referential system of positive logistic functions has a fixedpoint.
Just iterate from (0,0,0,…); each component must increase with every step; this
converges to a fixedpoint in the closed interval [0, ∞]. Therefore positive
logistic systems of any dimension can self-refer. This implies, among other
things, infinite sums and reductions.
Full logistic
systems, which include reciprocal as well as the additions, do not preserve
linear order; nonetheless they can still self-refer. The interval [0,∞] is compact and convex; so are finite
powers of it; so by Brouwer’s theorem, any
finite-dimensional logistic system can self-refer. If the system is
infinite-dimensional, then a fixedpoint exists by Tychonoff’s theorem.
Here
are some logistic systems:
x = 1/x
“This
sentence is false.”
It
has a solution: x = 1.
x = x+1
“This
sentence and the Liar are true.”
Solution:
x = ∞. Infinite, or false.
x = x{+}1
“This
sentence or the Liar are true.”
Solution:
x = 0. Void, or true.
x = 1 + 1/x
“The
Liar is true and this sentence is false.”
Solution:
x = the golden mean, about 1.6108;
therefore falser than the Liar.
x = 1 {+}
1/x
“The
Liar is true or this sentence is false.”
“This
sentence implies the Liar.”
Solution:
x = 1/phi, about 0.6108; therefore truer
than the Liar.
x = 4(x
{+} 1/x)
= (x{+}1/x)+ (x{+}1/x)+ (x{+}1/x)+ (x{+}1/x)
“This
sentence is true or false, and this sentence is true or false, and this
sentence is true or false, and this sentence is true or false.”
Solutions:
x = zero, or root 3 (about 1.732).
x = (x
+ 1/x)/4
= (x+1/x){+}(x+1/x){+} (x+1/x){+} (x+1/x)
“This sentence
is true and false, or this sentence is true and false, or this sentence is true
and false, or this sentence is true and false.”
Solutions:
x = infinity, or root 1/3 (about 0.577).
x = (x
+ 2/x) / 2
= (x +
1/x + 1/x) {+} (x + 1/x + 1/x)
“This
sentence is true, and it is false, and it is false,
or
this
sentence is true, and it is false, and it is false.”
Solutions:
x = infinity, or root 2 (about 1.414).
x = 2(x
{+} 1/(2x))
= (x {+}
1/x {+} 1/x) + (x {+} 1/x {+} 1/x)
“This
sentence is true, or it is false, or it is false,
and
this
sentence is true, or it is false, or it is false.”
Solutions:
x = zero, or root ½ (about 0.7071).
x = 1/x
+ (x~x)
= 1/x +
(x{+}1/x) + (x{+}1/x)
“This
sentence is false, and it is equivalent to itself.”
“This
sentence is false, and it is true or false, and it is true or false.”
Solution:
same as the solution to x4-2x2-1=0:
x
= sqrt( 1 + sqrt(2) )
About 1.553773974
x = 1
+ (x~x)
= 1 +
(x{+}1/x) + (x{+}1/x)
“The
Liar is true, and this sentence is equivalent to itself.”
“The
Liar is true, and this sentence is true or false, and it is true or false.”
Solution:
same as the solution to x3-x2-x-1=0:
x
= ( cuberoot(19+sqrt(297)) + cuberoot(19-sqrt(297)) + 1 ) / 3
About 1.839286755
x = 1/x {+} (x + 1/x)
“This sentence
is false, or it is true and false.”
“If this
sentence is true, then it is true and false.”
Solution: same
as the solution to x4+x2-1=0:
x
= sqrt(1/phi), where phi is the golden
mean
x is about 0.7861513778
Here is a
two-component fixedpoint:
A
= 1/A {+} 1/B
B = 1/B {+} A
Tweedledee: “If I’m not mistaken, then Tweedledum is mistaken.”
Tweedledum: “If I’m not mistaken, then Tweedledee is not mistaken.”
Iteration solution: (0.7653668647... , 0.5411961001...)
This matches the algebraic solution:
A = sqrt( 2 - sqrt(2) )
B = sqrt( 1 - 1 / sqrt(2) )
B = 1/B {+} A
Tweedledee: “If I’m not mistaken, then Tweedledum is mistaken.”
Tweedledum: “If I’m not mistaken, then Tweedledee is not mistaken.”
Iteration solution: (0.7653668647... , 0.5411961001...)
This matches the algebraic solution:
A = sqrt( 2 - sqrt(2) )
B = sqrt( 1 - 1 / sqrt(2) )
No comments:
Post a Comment